![]() | ![]() |
|
News From the Bush Kamp(f) Wednesday, March 15, 2000 -- WASHINGTON DC (APJP) -- Forget the media hype over the "tight" race expected for the presidency in November. The truth is that the Republican Party has no idea what's going to hit it during the late summer and early fall of this year -- that is, if the DNC and Gore's campaign team know what they're doing -- and we think they finally do. There is no close race in the offing. George W. Bush will lead the GOP to the party's most humiliating defeat in the nation's history -- and take the House and perhaps even the Senate with him! First and foremost, George W. is a loser -- a born loser. It's written all over him, and its been demonstrated time and again throughout his lackluster life. He is the candidate who waltzed into the Austin Governor's mansion on Daddy's say-so -- and by lying through his teeth about iconic former Governor Anne Richards. He has done countless "favors" for big business -- favors that hurt the voters and environment of Texas badly -- and he continues to do so. His little "bend over" for the funeral industry and his friendship with the now-indicted chief of coffins in Texas and around the country is enough to make Watergate look like a child's prank. Allegations of Bush Baby having been busted for cocaine possession and the subsequent fixing of a judge who sentenced him to community service will also turn out to be true -- although it will have the effect of making him popular with certain users in our culture. The things he did while an admitted drunk, drunk driver, and worse will also come to the fore as the media hone in, looking for the dirt that makes their profits. To put it in seven words: Bush is a goner before he starts.
Although another man did order the murder, who would be better than former inmate Hatfield to know the inner workings of the judicial and penal system in Texas -- and who would have a better ear for jailhouse gossip, which any beat reporter will tell you is more often than not true. But for purposes of argument, let's assume that BabyBush gets off on these more flamboyant charges and that no one exposes him for what he is: a pampered, undisciplined brat who didn't even break a sweat until his late forties. And even then, Daddy had to buy him a ball club which was merely fiscal preparation for the Baby to step into the Governor's mansion with enough money to pay for his daughter's private school tuition.
Let's assume all of that -- and analyze the real impossibility of BushBrat winning even 105 electoral votes come November. First, by moving far to the right during the primary, Bush has aligned himself with such luminaries as Newt Gingrich, Henry Hyde, the House Mangler Lynch Mob who took a dump on our Constitution and broke umpteen federal laws in an attempt to force Clinton to resign from the Presidency. Second, let's tune in on BushPals Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell, two snotball televangelist thieves who think the Christian Right is in their back pockets. The truth is that Robertson and Falwell combined control less than 1.5 million votes in this nation -- and at least half of those idiots don't bother to vote, or cannot, because they've given all their spare cash to $4,000-a-suit crooks like Robertson to support his billionaire lifestyle and have no way to get to the polls. Robertson, who ran telephone commercials for Bush in Michigan, saw how well they worked. They didn't. What Americans don't know is that most politicians aren't that stupid. Sure, they take money legally from anyone they can get it from. But when it comes to doing favors -- well, the suckers who contributed don't get jack squat. That's right. Pols take advantage of big givers all the time. They take their money -- but they give nothing but maybe a White House dinner or a private tour of the Oval Office in exchange. And that's all these corporate creeps want -- a chance to push their snake oil in person with the Chief, whether that's the President or the Governor of Texas. However, in Bush Baby's' case, the money can be directly traced to gubernatorial favors that cost Texans millions of dollars. But Bush goes further: he actually pays off his contributors with favors which give them or save them billions. All he does is take a piece of the action -- a famous RNC ploy as a campaign contribution, or series of contributions. Fourth, wonder why oil prices are so high today? Well, it's no conspiracy theory that Kuwait and the rest of the thieving Arab Oil Sheiks are paying Old Man Bush back for his largesse in Desert Storm. Yeah. We supported a crooked hideous regime -- the Kuwaiti government, another non-democracy which preys on women, in order to stop Saddam Hussein from trying to grab a warm-water port. Remember, even though we agree that Saddam is crap, the Kuwaitis and Saudis are no better. And now they are holding you hostage today to make the Clinton-Gore Administration look impotent in the arena of lowerinf gas prices, only to offer the BushBaby a chance to "lower gas taxes," making their oil even more alluring to western crackers like HexxonMojo and Gulf. You see, lowering the gas taxes -- and, by the way, ruining you local road-building projects -- does nothing more than make gasoline blending cheaper for all those concerned, including the Arab oil sheiks! And you moron corn farmers -- take a look! I bet you ADM has not raised the price you pay for your corn one cent even though they are getting 40% more for their corn-based ethanol. What's their excuse this time? If you think that Bush couldn't possibly get the Arabs to curtail production and raise oil prices to record levels - think again. Remember, it took a lot for Bush Daddy to intervene in the Gulf. You might recall that George Sr., Jordan's King Hussein and Iraq's "Sodom" Hussein were bosom buddies for decades, and the reason Bush didn't flatten Iraq was for just this reason. And if you don't believe that (and that Colin Powell was little more than a Bush puppet), check out the superhighway we were building and continued to build between Jordan and Baghdad before, during and after so-called Desert Storm for the benefit of Saddam AND King Hussein. Things are dicier than you think. Add to this the fact that George Sr. and even the Baby Bush are still big players -- in an influence-peddling way -- in the oil "binniss." Think: why isn't Bush calling for an attack on these Arab oil-producing nations and instead suddenly pushing to lowering gas taxes? When Saddam threatened American pocketbooks Bush Sr. went to war (well, sort of). Now we are threatened again, but everyone just sits by and lets Americans pay the price. Something is rotten in the Middle East -- and it ain't Israel! Let's get back to Bush. Fifth, you hear tell that Bush is really popular among Latinos in Texas. Well, that's not true. More than 45% of them hate his guts. Sure, Bush won some Latino votes, some stupid Latino votes -- but the truth is that Bush has let the Hispanic population in Texas down time after time, pushing Anglo education standards difficult if impossible to meet for Spanish-speaking kids. He has favored school vouchers, which deal out poor Latinos from good schools -- and he has left Latinos and Latinas and their babies to starve at the Texas borders in "colonias" on the US-Texas soil that rival the ghettos of Eastern Europe under Hitler.
Sticking to bigotry, lets move on to Bush having sold his home in Texas with a deed which forbade the buyers both to sell to any "Negro" family and to allow Blacks to even live in their home except as servants. Now, such deed provisions are unconstitutional -- but I can tell you that this writer and many others have had those provisions struck from their deeds before passing ownership. Bush didn't even bother, although he knew very well about this provision when he purchased the house -- or should have known as a future "inclusive" public official. And don't tell me that Ronald Reagan went there as well -- Ron Reagan was too silly to know where he was -- and I love the guy. Of course, we could excuse Bush Baby on these grounds as well -- but as far as I know, he isn't a candidate for Alzheimer's. Reagan may have been suffering from the disease long before we all thought (ask Leslie Stahl at CBS) -- and Bush still isn't a big enough man to fill one of Reagan's shoes with his entire body. Care for more bigotry? Let's look to Bush's record opposing runs against affirmative action and early education programs for minorities. He was on the front lines against equal opportunity admissions to colleges in Texas and supported the racists in California who crafted Proposition 209 and passed it, thus denying admission to college to Black and Latino students in record numbers. No room for late bloomers -- or kids stunted by poverty in Texas or California. Wow, what an INCLUSIVE man the Bush Baby is. Who knows whether one of the kids in the back of that long line to the Texas Air National guard was killed or wounded taking BushBaby's place on the ground in South Vietnam? In terms of American voters , who are these Bush people? Well, Southerners -- or so you might think. But even they won't vote for Bush in numbers large enough for him to get their electoral votes. Remember, Clinton-Gore beat Old Man Bob Dole and Bush Daddy in five key Southern States, both in 1992 and 1996. So just where will Bush get his votes? I'll give him Mississippi -- the state with the highest rate of illiteracy in the land -- only rivaled by Rwanda, and led politically by helmet-headed Trent Lott. That's another 7 votes. Total thus far: 39. Oklahoma -- yes! It's a state stupid enough to elect a Black Republican to the House of Representatives (JC "Daddy" Watts, an American oxymoron) and a janitor to the US Senate. Oklahoma would definitely go for Bush. That's 8 more votes, for a total of 47. Iowa -- why not? What else would a bunch or corn blowers and pig farmers hope for but an arrogant Idaho -- land of killer cops, psychotic militiamen, and white supremacist "Christian Identity" racists, with 4 electoral votes. Idaho is also Bush country (assuming Buchanan doesn't take the state) -- so now Bush has 58. Throw in the farmer state Dakotas, Dole's Kansas idiots and Nebraska, and BushBaby gets another 17 for a new sub total of 75. Now, I'll even give him the Carolinas -- although he might lose North Carolina, which has some good universities in it. That's another 22 votes for 97 electoral votes. Then there's Alaska, where men are men and women are men. That's another three votes for a Grand Total of 100 electoral votes. 100! And that's it. I wouldn't give him another state -- including Colorado, Nevada, Utah, Georgia, Virginia, or Indiana, which have some very smart people in residence and a lot of minorities who don't cotton to bigots and will turn out to vote against him -- minorities and Whites too smart to vote for someone just because he happened to be born. That's what will defeat him in the end -- Mormons don't like bigoted punks either. Now let's turn to Gore. Well, the math is simple: Bush gets 100, Gore wins the rest -- including California (54), New York (33) and Illinois (22).
Lets also get rid of this fairy tale that Bush tells about the Tsi Lai Temple. What Bush expects you to believe is that Gore sat down with Bruce Lindsey and all the "Chinks" (that's what Bush calls them) in Washington and plotted to take money from self-impoverished monks at some temple in Los Angeles. Bush thinks you, the American voter -- smart enough to have become the world's only superpower -- will believe him when he accuses Al Gore of being a felon even though the entire FBI is against him and would have loved to prove Bush right, but couldn't. Bush also wants you to believe that Clinton and GORE are Chinese agents ready to sell Well, I guess he wants you to believe the same thing about Haley Barbour -- the former chairman of the Republican National Committee who floated down Kowloon Bay with Chinese businessmen and took millions from them which he refused to return -- a crime far worse than Bush so foolishly accuses Gore of. Yup -- that's your definition of "respect." And that's all it takes to be the next President of the United States, George W. Not. JEFF KOOPERSMITH is a political consultant, opinion research authority, policy analyst, and self-described "renegade lobbyist." | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Copyright © 2004, 1996-2003, American Politics Journal Publications, Inc. All rights reserved. Read our privacy policy. Contact us. Operating software by Underwriters Digital Research. Data development by Gaudette & Associates. ISSN No. 1523-1690 | ![]() ![]() | ||