American Politics Journal

Guest Commentary
Steven C. Day's Guide to
THOSE COMMON SENSE CONSERVATIVES

Feb. 1, 2001 (APJP) -- Another election has come and gone, and once again we have seen our friends to the right dust off their patented "common sense" argument. It goes like this: Voters should reject liberal candidates because they are a soft-headed bunch who are always chasing after some do-gooder pie in the sky dream. Conservatives, on the other hand, have their feet firmly glued to the ground. No chasing after rainbows for them. No, Sir, just good old fashion common sense.

So strong is the right wing's infatuation with this story line, that in addition to attacking actual card-carrying liberals with it during the recent election, they also tried to use it against Al Gore, of all people. Come on folks, get real. Whatever else could be said against the former Veep, one thing he could not be "accused" of was rock-solid liberalism (which is a damn shame, really - if he had run as a liberal he might have won by a big enough margin that even Katherine Harris, Jeb Bush and the Supreme Court working in tandem could not have denied him office).

Still, since conservatives will no doubt continue to use this "we're sensible/they're wacky" argument against liberal candidates, real and imagined, we should probably put it to the test.

Let's start with

THE "WACKY WORLD" OF LIBERALISM

Most liberals believe that:

No doubt about it, those liberals are one wacky bunch.

Now let's look at

THOSE "COMMON SENSE" CONSERVATIVES

Most conservatives believe that:

Yep, those conservatives sure do have good common sense...

..or could it be that someone is pulling my leg?


SpacerAmerican Politics Journal
HomeLatestArchiveSearch


Copyright © 2001, 2000, 1999, 1998, 1997, 1996, American Politics Journal Publications, Inc.
All rights reserved. Read our privacy policy. Contact us.
ISSN No. 1523-1690