A Nation at War
Newswire
Subscribe
Links
Quotes
Letters
Search
Cool tools! APJ recommends:
 
Favorite Features!
The Wit and Wisdom (NOT) of Ann Coulter
Paul Wellstone 1944-2002
Investigate September 11th -- must reads
Julie Hiatt Steele's Report on the Office of Independent Counsel
The 2002 Boycott List
How Al Gore Won In 2000: links to the best coverage
David Bossie, Bush Mandate, Swift Boat Veterans, Swift Boat Veterans for Truth, Eugene Gaudette, Gene Gaudette, Jerome Corsi, Compassionate conservatism, Chris Ruddy, Christopher Ruddy, TrustE, Jeff Koopersmith, Ed Gillespie, fourth most liberal member of the Senate, Unelectable, Herpes, Miserable Failure, Venereal Disease, Carlton Sherwood, Stupid, How to Talk to a Liberal Joseph Farah, Joseph Farah, Joseph Farah, Joseph Farah, Joseph Farah, Joseph Farah, Joseph Farah, Tammy Bruce, Tammy Bruce, Tammy Bruce, Tammy Bruce, Tammy Bruce, Tammy Bruce, Tammy Bruce, Tammy Bruce

Flush twice... it's a long way to Sally Quinn's place!

Pundit Pap for Sunday, February 13, 2005
Iran Wins Iraq Election
by the Pundit Pap Team
JJ Balzer | Jeff Koopersmith | Jodi Schmidt

Feb. 13, 2005 (apj.us) -- It comes as somewhat of a surprise that the two prime topics of this Sunday's excuses for public affairs television were the Iraqi elections and Social Security.

The at-last-released results of the Iraqi election were the hottest topic of the weekend -- though the major broadcasters tried to downplay the fact that the win by a bloc of Shi'ite-aligned parties (including the United Iraqi Alliance, Shi'ite Islamic Party, Islamist Islamic Party, Even More Islamic Islamic Party, and of course the Party So Islamic You'll Plotz) win the election -- for Iran!

Topic two was the Bush Boy's Social Security non-plan "plan." The jockeying for position by moderate Democrats and Republicans appears to be continuing as we go to press. Social Security junkies already know enough to have bookmarked Josh Marshall's "Talking Points Memo" blog (http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com) for the latest on who's aligned with whom or what. We're predicting that fainthearted GOPers will in the end kill anything beyond token "reform," knowing full well that the so-called third rail of US national politics has the most amperage it's had in over a decade.

Yes, we were surprised that the Howard-Dean-hating broadcast media let the former Vermont governor's ascent to chairmanship of the Democratic National Committee slide to third place. After all, they can't stand the guy -- a guy who calls 'em as he sees 'em, and such a a clear and present threat to the status quo enjoyed by every establishment politician and incestuous spinmeister in the Beltway that they had to depict him as nuts. And, in the brief time that each show did pay to Dean's victory, they had to play that "scream" -- which, it has been noted by more than one broadcast engineer to which Dave "Doctor" Gonzo has spoken, has been clearly "sound-enhanced" to make Dean sound unhinged.

We think Dean should actually make an issue of that -- it is, after all, another sham story cut from the same Röveian cloth as the Armstrong Williams payola scandal, The Jim "Jeff Gannon" Guckert aliases-for-access scandal and the "Iraq has WMDs and you'd better report it as your lead story" scandal.

Yes, we're saying it right here and now -- the "Dean scream" is yet another ersatz story, in this case designed to defuse a politician Karl Röve had at first written off as a darkest of dark horses, only to see him gain traction and credibility, and get Democrats to empower themselves with real grassroots progress.

After all, let us not forget that even though 2004 did not turn out the way it should have -- because average Americans bought into the fear and paranoia being peddled by the Chimp and his handler Pudgy Karl -- the Democrats did in one year what it took the GOP a decade to do: build the foundation and a good part of the structure of a grassroots movement. And now, one of its architects is poised to lead the party.

Topic four was the announcement that diminutive faux-Commie martinet and film critic "Li'l KIm" Jong-Il claims he has the bomb. His North Korean surrogates have also made it clear that they don;t like the way Generalissimo Short Stuff was depicted in Trey Parker and Matt Stone's over-the-top, marionette-sex-filled film-musical-satire "Team America: World Police." Rumors are abounding that Kim is scrambling for missile technology that will allow his delivery systems to reach Hollywood.

Hoo-boy.

Here's the rundown on America's Funniest Pundit Videos (this week, at least):

Meet the Press

The fictitious Iraqi election results were announced today. The big losers were Americans -- because our hand-selected Iraqi leader, Iyad Allawi, was dis-Allawied to keep his post in the postwar conflagration that marks the current situation in this desert nation. Mr. Allawi and his party got a whopping 14% -- yes, FOURTEEN percent -- while the Shi'ites gained 48% and the Kurds 26%. Where the other 12% went we don't know -- but it was surely split up among the 2 trillion other parties that have emerged since George W. Bush launched his offensive against fellow oil man Saddam Hussein years ago.

Meet the Press "moderator" Tim Russert turned to the darling of the right, Richard Engel of NBC News, to tell us what's supposedly happening in Iraq. Engel's answer: Allawi is Outee; the Sunnis will be asked to help write the Iraqi constitution, and some of them may even become ministers to placate them for not voting. Engel also "surprised" us by telling Russert (and, more importantly, American viewers) that training of Iraqi police and national guardsmen was not going all that well.

Really? What a shock!

Election week witnesses an apex of terrorist -- or "insurgent," if you prefer -- operations with hundreds murdered and a loss of more American boys and girls, men and women. Thus far, Mr. Bush's interloping has caused nearly 1,500 Americans to die a tragic death, which impacts more than 50,000 American family members here at home. In addition, around 12,000 of America's bravest lie in hospitals or recovery from wounds so horrible as to not be described. Yes, they are heroes -- not for us, but for each other. War is about defending the man to your right and to your left -- not about pushing the almost-always-insane ideologies of the men and women who send you to war. And let's not forget the Iraqi dead -- perhaps more than 100,000 -- and the millions of family members that suffer as a result. They will not soon forget -- if ever.

Tim Russert moved from his manic near-hysteria over the "success" of these elections to the current battle between the people of the Untied States and Mr. Bush over Social Security "reform."

Remember, kiddies, when you hear the word "reform" coming out of the mouths of politicians it means "destruction." Just ask the poorest of the poor forced to work at Taco Bell for a few dollars an hour under Mr. Clinton's "reform" of the American well-being -- oops! I mean "welfare" -- system ,or "state" depending upon which side of the aisle you happen to sit in.

So Russert began with the lightweight Senator Chuck Grassley (R-IA) -- who only last week criticized the Bush non-plan for Social Security "reform." And what did Grassley do? He defended the Bush "plan"! Grassley was talking about "Grassley Grandparents" without realizing he was one of them, and seemed glued to Bush's plan to engage the American people in focusing on the "problem" and -- get this -- do so "as a professor."

Right, Chuck! "Professor" Bush? He's sounding more and more like "Professor Blutarsky" with each passing day! Then, Grassley tells us, he and Rep. Charlie Rangel (D-NY) will work out "the details." Geez -- they must be joking.

And who was appearing in Russert's pundit fiefdom this Sunday to fight for the working man -- against a "preznit" who has no idea how to invest in American business with the "privatized" percentage of the system that Bush wants to set aside for Sanford Weil and his buddy boys and Wall Street? Why -- Charlie Rangel, my favorite House Member for New York.

Rangel pointed out that Bush had no plan -- which is still pretty much a secret.

The rest of the discussion was a counterpoint of lies and overstatements from Grassley and pithy retorts from Rangel. Russert, who can't think of questions on his own, resorted to his usual Internet-and-RNC-gathered quotations from both men to embarrass them. To both of their credit, they ignored Russert -- sticking to their talking points.

"President Bush is Professor Bush" -- aaugh!

Next came a shoot out between former Soviet dissident turned Israeli elder statesman Natan (Anatoly) Sharansky and Pat Buchanan. They were arguing over Sharansky's well-known scholarship on the importance of Democracy -- so well-known, in fact, that Mr. Bush calls Sharansky's book, "The Case for Democracy," part of his "presidential DNA." (I felt a strong urge to vomit -- until we deduced that the rest of his "presidential DNA" must be traceable to "Zippy the Pinhead.").

Here's the truth: what Bush actually did was bastardize ideas set forth in Sharansky's worthwhile book and make it an excuse for demanding -- through his puppet "Secretary of State" Condi Rice -- that all dictatorships now become democracy or face the wrath of the United States.

And so I found myself in agreement with ol' Pitchfork Pat Buchanan, who thinks Mr. Bush is a moron -- and makes that crystal clear. Buchanan puts it blithely: "Intervention is a form of terror."

Wow! Right on, Pat!

Pat and Natan went back and forth arguing about whether or not it was a wise idea to make the Saudis, the Egyptians, the Jordanians, the Kuwaitis and the "rest of them there potentatencies" democracies.

Buchanan feels that this kind of gibberish is simply formed from naiveté. He is right, and we will soon see the results of this. But Buchanan did not stop there, bless his black little heart: he hit the mark, telling Russert that Osama bin Laden did not attack the World Trade Center because he was concerned about democracy, but because he was tired of having American troops in Middle East imposing "democracy," which in short means more money for American corporate interests.

Now, whether one subscribes to the theory that what's best of Halliburton is best for the United States or not is another issue. The real point was that Bush lied about it.

Anyway, aside from Russert embarrassing Sharansky with a twenty-year-old video clip of him and his knit-bereted wife on Meet the Press after his release from the Gulag, the show was over.

Hail Buchanan!

-- Jeff Koopersmith

McLaughlin Romper Room: Condi's Selling Snake Oil (And No One's Buying)!

Feb. 13, 2005 -- BALTIMORE (apj.us) -- It was another edition of Romper Room, aka The McLaughlin Group. And once again, Johnny Mac went back to his standard operating procedure of letting one issue nearly take over the show, and use bizarre filler segments at the very end. Fortunately, the beginning issues are well worth the time (usually) that he spends on them!

Issue #1: Around The World In Eight Days (aka: Condi's Snake Oil Tour)!

John McLaughlin did a run-down of Condi Rice's itinerary during her eight-day overseas "fence-mending" tour, then asked if it did any good:

Pat Buchanan: Almost flawless tour in terms of being charming -- but couldn't overcome basic differences between US and rest of the world, such as Kyoto, International Criminal Court, etc.

Newsweek's Eleanor Clift: Her softer symbolism can't over Bush's (and her own) harsh rhetoric -- the comments she made about North Korea during her confirmation hearings were brought repeatedly during the European leg of her tour.

Tony Blankley (aka Jabba) of the Moonie Times: Blather blather blather blather play 'divide and conquer' wedge politics with Europe blather blather blather...

Johnny Mac put a cork in Jabba's mouth, then invited this week's guest panelist MSNBC's Lawrence O'Donnell, to respond:

O'Donnell: It was a good thing that she made the trip, but it's not substantive. It's all symbolism.

McL. Does the trip signify a change in US foreign policy?

O'Donnell: (Laughs) No, not at all. It's all symbolism.

Johnny Mac then discussed Condi's rather quixotic efforts to jump-start the Sharon-Abbas peace talks. Buchanan said that the credit for restarting the talks goes to Abbas, not Condi Rice.

McLaughlin then brought up Rice's admonishing Europe to get tough with Iran over its allegedly revived nuclear program, and asked if this helps or hurts us with either Europe or Iran.

Clift: Rice humiliated her European hosts -- and set back their negotiations with the Iranians.

Jabba: Blather blather blather tough stance blather blather blather...

McLaughlin, who has a bit of a soft spot for Condi, then tried to invent a rational reason for her bizarre hectoring of the Euros: He wondered out loud if she was trying to set up a "good cop, bad cop" arrangement with the Europeans with regard to Iran -- with Condi as the bad cop.

Jabba: Blather blather blather...

Buchanan: We can't do anything about Iran, and everyone knows that. Rice and Bush talk tough but they can't back it up, and that shows weakness. It's just like how they're dealing with North Korea -- they talk tough and make threats, but they never back them up.

McLaughlin then touched off a three-minute-long verbal food fight with the question: "Does Bush have plans to invade Iran? I say no."

No sooner had the dust settled on that when another fight broke out over what Rice should have done and said, and whether the US can keep getting away with making threats and not backing them up. By the time the shouting died down, the show was more than half over.

Johnny Mac finished off the topic with this call for moderation: "A little of our power goes a long way."

Issue #2: North Korea And The Bomb!

McLaughlin ran footage of North Korea's bomb claims, followed by Rice and Rummy's pooh-poohing these claims. He then asked: "Is North Korea bluffing?"

Clift: Nope -- they already have at least eight to twelve bombs, or will have them soon.

Jabba: Blather blather blather...

Next, Johnny Mac compared the Bushies' current meekness on North Korea's verified possession of actual nukes with the Bushies' ranting and raving over Iran, which once had a nuclear program but hasn't done anything with it in years. He brought up the recent comments of both IAEA head Mohammed El-Baradei and UN weapons inspector chief Hans Blix, and noted that these men, unlike the Bushies, were right on Iraq and WMD.

McLaughlin then followed this up by noting that the neo-cons want to get El-Baradei removed from his IAEA job -- and with everything that he'd mentioned before, he obviously wanted his audience to connect the dots and realize that the neo-cons want to punish El-Baradei for being right -- and he asked if this should happen.

Buchanan: No, absolutely not.

Clift: No! He's being targeted because he was right and they were wrong.

O'Donnell: No, he needs to stay on.

Well, by this time there was, like, maybe three minutes left. So Johnny Mac wrapped up this issue and went to...

Issue #3: Judge Caught With Knife On Plane! (How Effing Stupid Is This?!)

Johnny Mac asked: Should the prosecution throw the book at him?

The panelists went back-and-forth between "Hey, he's a judge, not a terrorist!" and "Why should we go any easier on him than anyone else?" (However, everyone was in agreement that the guy was an effing idiot.) But really, this "issue" was a waste of precious minutes that could have been devoted to either Iran or Korea.

With barely a minute to go, Johnny Mac once again showed his complete lack of time management skills by bringing up some ridiculous quiz about Tony Blair. Again, he could have used this time to talk about either of the first two issues. But it's his gig, I guess.

And that was that.

-- Jodi Schmidt

APJ Super Search + Include Stop-Terms
Sort by Display Case Sensitive Whole Words Only
Search Content Body Title URL
Alt-Text Links Default
Meta-Description Meta-Keywords Meta-Authors

Copyright © 2005, 1999-2004, American Politics Journal Publications, Inc. All rights reserved. Read our privacy policy. Contact us. Operating software by Underwriters Digital Research. Data development by Gaudette & Associates. ISSN No. 1523-1690